Once in a while you read an article on the newspaper and feel compelled to respond to it.
There was one such article, titled "Sorry boys, it's only ACS(I) dates for me", involving a certain Miss Jiang Lai, a former St. Nicholas and ACJC student China-born Singapore PR. It was covered by The New Paper today, prompting me to look for the actual post she made a few days ago.
Basically, to Miss Jiang Lai, Chinese High boys are all ugly, RI boys less ugly, but very boring. Catholic High boys, from her experience with one, are average, repetitive and boring. St Andrews' are wannabes, imitations of ACS(I). And the rest of the boys school, "unmemorable to warrant mention".
I ought to defend my fellow shorts-wearing schoolmates, but it's really not worth spending too much effort on debunking her theories because they are all generalisations.
It's as good as me retaliating with unfair comments about:
St. Nicholas - where many of my family and friends came from -
or
ACJC - whose hockey girls in my time were hawt -
or
PRC girls - whom many have biased opinions of, but I still maintain my personal stand that a lot of them (from the huge sample size in China) are really nice and endearing (and hot, fair and smooth, as long as they shave).
But one subjective opinion I can make about Ms Jiang Lai is that she doesn't belong to the nice, endearing, hot, fair and smooth category of China girls I would love to know.
Shall not describe her physical features
So, my point is, if you're someone as pleasant-looking and as logical-sounding as Nicole Rebecca Seah.Nice
Or as hot and creamy as Fan Bing Bing or Zhao Wei, then you do have a beauty-given right to insult us non-ACS(I) boys.
Very nice
But if you're looking like that (see first two images of post), hello-oh, look in the mirror biatch.
Quoted for truth.
ReplyDeleteTOTALLY AGREED
ReplyDeleteThank You and that i have a nifty present: Where To Loan For House Renovation bungalow exterior makeover
ReplyDelete